A professional sportsman called Israel Folau is intent on making statements threatening people guilty of what he regards as immoral conduct with eternal damnation. He does so although requested to stop by those in charge of the sport that is the subject of his business.
The usual suspects are mouthing platitudes about freedom of speech. This in the Murdoch press is code for a licence to offend or insult others on the ground of their sexuality or religion. They are also referring to something called ‘freedom of religion.’
The defenders of Izzy would do better to focus on freedom of contract. If Folau can conduct himself in this way with impunity, the authors of the relevant contract should notify their PI insurers. Yet, the Murdoch press on the weekend said with a straight face that if Folau can be fired for breach of contract, the law might relieve him from the burden of his promise on some ground of public policy. So much for doctrinal consistency. So much for freedom of contract. So much for government keeping its hands off business.
But those who warble for money will continue to do so. Freedom of religion, whatever that means, is not in issue. The issue is whether Izzy is in breach of his contract or otherwise engaging in conduct that is contrary to the business interests of his employer to an extent that gives his employer the right to exclude him from that business.
Many Australians would start with two simple propositions. First, Izzy is in this for himself and not the team – no coach of any team sport would want to have anything to do with him. Secondly, to the extent that Izzy invokes God as a reason why he is hurting others – I refer to others in his sport, not the objects of his harangues – he deserves twice the punishment.
This dispute has little or nothing to do with God
The religion of Israel Folau does not command him to do what is complained of. (If it were said that his religion does issue such a command, then that in my view would make Izzy’s case so much worse.)
It is or should be obvious that Folau’s conduct is causing harm to his employer and others employed in that line of business. These days sponsors drop people cold for this kind of public bickering, moralizing and division. (If it matters – and it doesn’t – in my view Izzy’s conduct causes even greater harm to those who profess what he calls his faith. His is evidently a religion of division and eternal punishment and intolerance. His condemnation would extend to most honest people, and I take it that those who repent according to the faith of Judaism, Islam or Hinduism – or perhaps even the Church of Rome – do not escape Folau’s grizzly vision of the justice of his God.)
It also looks to me that Folau is in direct breach of an undertaking he gave to the CEO of the ruling body. If so, he cannot be taken at his word.
I agree with the Wallabies’ coach that Folau’s behaviour is incompatible with his remaining in the national side. This is not because he has unfortunate beliefs that some are prepared to call religious, but because he refuses to behave at the minimal level of tolerance and team work expected from someone who wears my jumper – or your jumper – or our jumper.
We recently celebrated the first anniversary of another incident that brought shame on us as a people in Cape Town – and this conduct of Izzy is at least in that league – in my view. If someone in my employ did the same to me, his feet would not touch the ground on the way out the door. I very much doubt whether any other Wallaby would want to have a person as self-centred as Izzy on his team. I certainly don’t want him in my jumper – and that’s before I get to the text of what Izzy is saying.
But, as I say, the warbling will go on from those who live off the earnings – or, perhaps, the droppings of conflict.
The ‘anti-996’ campaign is blacklisting companies such as Alibaba and JD.com where, it claims, shifts of 9 am to 9 pm, six days a week, are common. Alibaba has not commented. JD.com said it did not oblige staff to work such hours but it encouraged everyone to ‘fully invest themselves’.
Financial Times, 9 April, 2019
It makes you wonder if Spartacus and the cotton pickers realised that they were blessed insofar as they had ‘fully invested themselves.’