A company called Cleanaway Waste Management said this of its CEO, Mr Bansal:
The board of Cleanaway takes allegations of misconduct in the workplace very seriously. Mr Bansal had some issues with overly assertive behaviour in the workplace and has acknowledged that he needed to address them. The board is disappointed in the circumstances but has taken appropriate action. We have noted the committed and sincere manner in which Mr Bansal has responded. The board will not tolerate any further instances of unacceptable conduct.
After the board was advised of claims made about workplace behaviours involving Mr Bansal, a thorough independent investigation was conducted into the issues raised. Following this investigation, the board implemented a range of measures including executive leadership mentoring, enhanced reporting and monitoring of the CEO’s conduct. Mr Bansal has acknowledged that his behaviour should have been better and expressed contrition. He has discussed this openly with the board and with his colleagues and has embraced changes in his approach.
Mr Bansal said:
I accept the feedback and remain to totally committed to creating a progressive culture at Cleanaway while executing on our strategy and delivering ongoing financial performance.
(The Australian, 15 September, 2020)
The outsider might ask: ‘What the hell was all that about?’ The lawyer might ask: ‘If these statements were made purportedly pursuant to some legal imperative, what is it that triggers the requirement of something being noted pursuant to that imperative, and do these utterances fulfil any such obligation?’ And their author might be informed that for some, including this newspaper, ‘progressive’ is a term of abuse.